Posts Tagged ‘German Basic Law’

Paulskirchenverfassung

Thursday, April 3rd, 2014

The Paulskirchenverfassung (Constitution of St. Paul’s Church) might have been Germany’s very first Constitution, had it not been for Friedrich Wilhelm IV, reigning King of Prussia. Drawn up by the National Assembly in December 1848, the Paulskirchenverfassung called for basic civil rights, freedom of the press and the abolishment of the existing privileges of the nobility. The King himself had ordered it to be drawn up. But it hadn’t been his desire for democracy that had led him to take this step.

Who was King Friedrich Wilhelm IV?

Friedrich Wilhelm IV reigned from 1840 to 1861 and was the eldest son of Friedrich William II of Prussia. Friedrich Wilhelm IV was known as a romantic who had been responsible for the erection of many beautiful edifices in Berlin and Potsdam. He had also sponsored the completion of the cathedral in Cologne. But politically he seemed out of step with the times. When revolution broke out in Prussia, having spilled over from France, Friedrich Wilhelm IV feared that it might cost him the throne. After first trying to repress it with the army, he quickly decided to recall the troops instead and place himself at the head of the movement.

Friedrich Wilhelm IV, King of Prussia from 1840 to 1861

Friedrich Wilhelm IV, King of Prussia from 1840 to 1861

King Friedrich Wilhelm IV refused

Friedrich Wilhelm IV convened a National Assembly in 1949, and ordered a Constitution be drawn up. He hoped that the move would shore up his position. But when the National Assembly elected him as emperor of Germany, the king flatly refused. His refusal did not stem from modesty however. To the contrary. Friedrich Wilhelm supposedly responded by saying, “I do neither want the consent of the princes nor the crown. This so-called crown is not a crown but a dog collar. It bears the smell of the gutter of the revolution–the silliest, stupidest and worst of this century.” Feeling secure again in his position, he then dissolved the assembly and ordered the army to reoccupy Berlin.

Failed Paulskirchenverfassung

The adoption of the Paulskirchenverfassung had failed. Three months later, the military disbanded the remaining parliament. In keeping with the king’s motto, “Only soldiers can help stop democrats,” fundamental rights were abolished again and popular uprisings squashed.

When one hundred years later, the Grundgesetz (The German Basic Law or Constitution) was created, much of the wording of the Paulskirchenverfassung of 1948 was incorporated.

 

For a sneak peek at the first 20+ pages of my memoir, Walled-In: A West Berlin Girl’s Journey to Freedom, click “Download a free excerpt” on my home page and feel free to follow my blog about anything German: historic and current events, people, places and food.

Walled-In is my story of growing up in Berlin during the Cold War. Juxtaposing the events that engulfed Berlin during the Berlin Blockade, the Berlin Airlift, the Berlin Wall and Kennedy’s Berlin visit with the struggle against my equally insurmountable parental walls, Walled-In is about freedom vs. conformity, conflict vs. harmony, domination vs. submission, loyalty vs. betrayal.

 

Gender Gap Closure in Germany

Friday, November 15th, 2013

Germany ranks higher than the USA in the gender gap closure, according to an October 2013 report by the World Economic Forum.

History of German gender gap laws

Following World War II, the German Basic Law of 1949 (Grundgesetz) was supposed to include amendments relative to the equality of men and women (Gleichberechtigung). However, the Adenauer government failed to take action. Four years later, the German Federal Parliament (Deutscher Bundestag) took a major step toward implementing gender gap closure by revising the existing laws regarding individual rights. On 1 July 1958, the following changes relative to equality of men and women became effective:

Changes to German gender gap laws

  • The husband’s right of final decision in matrimonial matters was deleted.
  • The husband’s responsibility to provide for his family was retained.
  • Women were now permitted to manage assets they had brought into the marriage. Until then, her husband had the right to manage her assets, including any moneys she may have earned from gainful employment.
  • A husband could no longer terminate his wife’s employment. But it took until 1977 before a wife could work outside the home without her husband’s consent. And it was in 1977 that the partnership principle became effective which removed the division of marital responsibilities from the law and made it a private decision.
  • A wife was given the right to use her maiden name in addition to her family name. But not until 1977 could married couples choose whether they wanted to adopt the husband’s or the wife’s family name as their mutual last name. And not until 1994 was a marriage partner allowed to retain his or her separate family name.
  • The special rights of fathers relative to the education of the couple’s children were reduced and totally eliminated in 1979.

International gender gap closure rankings

In October 2013, the World Economic Forum released a report that benchmarks national gender gaps on economic, political, educational and health-based criteria and provides country rankings. Of the 136 countries surveyed, according to the report, Iceland did the best job of closing the gender gap in 2013, followed by Finland, Norway, and Sweden. Germany ranked 14th, Great Britain 18th, the USA 23rd, and France ranked 45th. Worst fared Chad, Pakistan and Yemen. For more detailed information please visit www3.weforum.org/WEF_GenderGap_Report_2013.pdf

 

For a sneak peek at the first 20+ pages of my memoir, Walled-In: A West Berlin Girl’s Journey to Freedom, click “Download a free excerpt” on the home page of http://www.walled-in-berlin.com. Walled-In is a story of growing up in Berlin during the Cold War.