Archive for the ‘Tête-à-Tête’ Category

Lebensborn – Nazi Baby Farms During Hitler’s Reign

Monday, August 17th, 2020

 

Lebensborn (loosely translated “Spring of Life”) was a secret breeding program established by Adolf Hitler in 1935. In keeping with Hitler’s Aryan master race concept, German Women of “pure” blood bore blond, blue-eyed children in its clinics. Fourteen of the clinics were located in Germany, nine more in Norway. Until the early 21st century, little was known about their existence because the Nazi officers, who had fathered the children, and the women who had born them, were too ashamed to admit to their role. I only learned about it 15 years ago.

What Prompted the Establishment of Lebensborn Clinics?

During World War I, over two million German soldiers lost their lives. Consequently, there was an acute shortage of marriageable men during the period between WWI and WWII. The abortion rate, on the other hand, was as high as 800,000 annually because women chose abortions to avoid the social stigma attached to bearing children out of wedlock.

Hitler wanted every family to have at least four children, but most married couples produced smaller families. Therefore, to increase family size, he created an incentive for high-ranking Nazi officials with desirable Aryan traits. The more children they had, the less taxes they paid. Lebensborn was to kill two birds with one stone: It was to (1) increase the number of children born while decreasing the rate of abortions and (2) enable unmarried pregnant women to give birth anonymously away from home.

How did the Program Work?

To start with, the Nazis worked on changing peoples’ views about illegitimate children. Hitler declared that as long as there was an imbalance in the population of childbearing age, people “shall be forbidden to despise a child born out of wedlock”. Moreover, leaders of the German Girl’s League were instructed to recruit young women with the potential of becoming desirable breeding partners for Nazi officers. One Lebensborn mother, Hildegard Koch, described how the program worked. https://spartacus-educational.com/Hildegard_Koch.htm The women were introduced to several Nazi officers at the clinic and were given about a week to pick the man they liked best. They were never told the names of any of the men. When the women had made their choice, they had to wait until the tenth day after the beginning of their last mensis. Following a medical examination they received permission to receive the men in their rooms at night.

The Lebensborn (loosely translated "Spring of Life") Programwas established by Adolf Hitler in 1935 in Nazi Germany. www.walled-in-berlin.com

The Lebensborn (loosely translated “Spring of Life”) Program was established by Adolf Hitler in 1935 in Nazi Germany. www.walled-in-berlin.com

Result of the Lebensborn Program

Some 8,000 children were born in Lebensborn clinics in Germany and another 12,000 in Norway. In many cases, the fathers were married Nazi officers who complied with Hitler’s directive to spread their Aryan seeds. If the mother did not want to keep the child, Lebensborn offered adoption services. The identity of the fathers was kept secret and most documents were burnt at the end of the war.

Lebensborn Aftermath

After the war, many Lebensborn mothers were too ashamed to tell their children about their participation in the program. As a result, these children were unable to discover the identity of their father. They had been bred to become the elite of Hitler’s imagined 1,000-year Reich and ended up cowed by shame, alienation and uncertainty.

The children born in Norway suffered even more. Because the Nazis had encouraged German soldiers to produce children with women of Viking blood, the children born to these hand-selected women of “pure” blood were ostracized and mistreated for many years after World War II had ended. Many never recovered from the stigma of having a German father. Some of the children were even put in mental asylums because Norwegians did not want their German genes to spread.

Why didn’t Hitler have Any Children?

Why did Adolf Hitler want every German family to produce four children while he himself never married (except for the last few hours before he committed suicide in his bunker) and never had any children at all? Most likely, the reason was that there was incest and mental illness in Hitler’s family, a fact that he kept to himself. At a time when his party euthanized people with mental and/or physical ailments, he had no desire to father children who may not have fit the Nazi ideal.

 

For a sneak peek at the first 20+ pages of my memoir, Walled-In: A West Berlin Girl’s Journey to Freedom, click “Download a free excerpt” on my home page and feel free to follow my blog about anything German: historic and current events, people, places and food.

Walled-In is my story of growing up in Berlin during the Cold War. Juxtaposing the events that engulfed Berlin during the Berlin Blockade, the Berlin Airlift, the Berlin Wall and Kennedy’s Berlin visit with the struggle against my equally insurmountable parental walls, Walled-In is about freedom vs. conformity, conflict vs. harmony, domination vs. submission, loyalty vs. betrayal.

Hamburg Epidemic – Historical Perspective on COVID-19

Monday, July 20th, 2020

 

In 1892 the city of Hamburg, Germany, was hit by a cholera epidemic. Within six weeks nearly 10,000 people died, and within two months 600,000 had died from the disease. In his 1987 book, Death in Hamburg: Society and Politics in the Cholera Years (1830-1910), Sir Richard J. Evans examines the events surrounding the outbreak. Questions that come to mind are: Are there any parallels to the COVID-19 crisis? Have we learned anything from past epidemics?

How the Hamburg Epidemic Got Started

Hamburg was the second largest city in Germany at the time. It was a one of the biggest seaports in the world and a popular springboard for Europeans wanting to start new lives in America. Having originated in India in the early 19th century, cholera had spread westward by trade and by the armies that marched across Europe. By the end of the 19th century, the threat of cholera seemed to have faded away. But in August 1892, a cholera pandemic broke out in Hamburg. Emigrants had brought the disease with them on trains from Russia. Since they tended to stay in run-down lodgings until ready for embarkation for the US, their infected feces went in the Elbe River, the city’s water supply. The infected water was then delivered to everyone who had a water supply connection.

 

Hamburg Harbor in 2015 as seen from the Elphi. Photo © J. Elke Ertle, 2015. www.walled-in-berlin.com

Hamburg Harbor in 2015 as seen from the Elphi. Photo © J. Elke Ertle, 2015. www.walled-in-berlin.com

Hamburg Government Reaction to the Epidemic

So, what did the Hamburg government do when the problem became known? At the time, Hamburg was an autonomous city-state within the German Empire. That meant that the city was run by merchant families. These business-oriented leaders put trade and economy above the residents’ welfare, and their first reaction was to suppress the news of the cholera outbreak. The reason was that they feared imposition of quarantines, which would damage trade. So, they instructed doctors to lie and attribute the deaths to other causes. It took a full week before the merchant leaders admitted to the presence of cholera.

When the government officials finally did jump into action, the disease could no longer be contained. The resulting economic repercussions were disastrous. Hamburg was immediately quarantined by the rest of Germany and soon by the rest of the world. Trade virtually came to a halt. Quarantine led to mass unemployment. The city’s health services were overwhelmed. No effective treatment was available, and the few available doctors were unable to cope. The political fallout from the disaster was extensive. Does any of this sound familiar so far?

Science Relative to Epidemics and Pandemics

About a decade earlier, German bacteriologist Robert Koch discovered that cholera was waterborne and transmitted via excrement. But the political leaders did not buy into the discovery. Instead, they continued to hold onto the view that cholera was spread by an invisible vapor, which no government could hope to prevent. While several other European cities had taken the scientific approach and begun to treat their water proactively, Hamburg’s merchant leaders had refused to commit taxpayers’ money to the water filtering. Now they were paying the price for putting profit over health.

What Happened After the Hamburg Epidemic

When the epidemic was over, the merchant leaders finally reacted. They pushed for a clean water supply, introduced state housing and hygiene inspections and made plans for a major program of slum clearance. But the damage was done. The electorate had lost trust in their leaders. A year after the cholera outbreak, Hamburg’s citizenry voted their incompetent merchant leaders out of office and replaced them with Social Democrats who prioritized science and health over profit. We will also elect our leaders this November. Will we see a similar reaction?

What did we learn?

The short answer is: Apparently not much. Although there are differences between the Hamburg epidemic and the COVID-19 pandemic (medicine wasn’t nearly as advanced in the early 19th century) there are also many parallels. While some countries were proactive with testing, tracing and quarantines during the coronavirus pandemic, others were reactive. https://www.newyorker.com/news/q-and-a/how-governments-respond-to-pandemics-like-the-coronavirus There was also a division in the acceptance of scientific evidence and predictions. China’s first reaction was to cover up the emergence of the virus. The Trump Administration’s first reaction was to deny and then to minimize its danger. Germany, led by a scientist-trained leader, prescribed to scientific methods with good results. The Trump Administration largely sidelined its medical experts and focused on the health of the economy with disastrous results.  The result was that as of 12 July 2020, Germany recorded 2,385 cases and 109 deaths per million of population while the US documented 10,136 cases and 415 deaths per million. https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/#countries.

 

For a sneak peek at the first 20+ pages of my memoir, Walled-In: A West Berlin Girl’s Journey to Freedom, click “Download a free excerpt” on my home page and feel free to follow my blog about anything German: historic and current events, people, places and food.

Walled-In is my story of growing up in Berlin during the Cold War. Juxtaposing the events that engulfed Berlin during the Berlin Blockade, the Berlin Airlift, the Berlin Wall and Kennedy’s Berlin visit with the struggle against my equally insurmountable parental walls, Walled-In is about freedom vs. conformity, conflict vs. harmony, domination vs. submission, loyalty vs. betrayal.

 

 

Spotting Psychopathy in the People Among US

Monday, June 15th, 2020

Dr. Robert D. Hare is Emeritus Professor of Psychology at the University of British Columbia, Canada, and a world-renowned expert in psychopathy. He studied psychopathy in the prison system and authored several books and more than one hundred scientific articles on the subject. https://psych.ubc.ca/profile/robert-hare/ In the 1970s, he developed the Hare Psychopathy Checklist to assess the presence of psychopathy in individuals.

Elements of the Hare Psychopathy Checklist

The updated Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R) is a diagnostic tool used to rate a person’s psychopathic or antisocial tendencies. It is made up of a list of 20 elements. A prototypical psychopath would receive a maximum score of 40, while someone with absolutely no psychopathic traits or tendencies would receive a score of zero. A score of 30 or above suggests psychopathy.

https://www.cbc.ca/doczone/m_features/the-hare-psychotherapy-checklist

Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R)

  1. Glib and Superficial Charm
  2. Grandiose (Exaggeratedly High) Estimation of Self
  3. Need for Stimulation or Proneness to Boredom
  4. Pathological Lying
  5. Conning and Manipulativeness
  6. Lack of Remorse or Guilt
  7. Shallow Affect (Superficial Emotional Responsiveness)
  8. Callousness and Lack of Empathy
  9. Parasitic Lifestyle
  10. Poor Behavioral Controls
  11. Sexual Promiscuity
  12. Early Behavior Problems
  13. Lack of Realistic, Long-Term Goals
  14. Impulsivity
  15. Irresponsibility
  16. Failure to Accept Responsibility for Own Actions
  17. Many Short-Term Marital Relationships
  18. Juvenile
  19. Revocation of Condition Release (pertains to Criminal Justice System)
  20. Criminal Versatility (pertains to Criminal Justice System)

 

Does this carrot look like a veggie psychopath who struts his ego big time? Photo © MT, 2020, www.walled-in-berlin.com

Does this carrot look like a veggie psychopath who struts his ego big time? Photo © MT, 2020, www.walled-in-berlin.com

 

Rather than pointing to a human example, let me anthropomorphize with this carrot. Does it look like a veggie psychopath who struts his ego big time? Can you think of human examples? Dr. Hare’s provides some suggestions as to where you might begin. https://www.walled-in-berlin.com/j-elke-ertle/psychopaths-are-social-predators/

 

For a sneak peek at the first 20+ pages of my memoir, Walled-In: A West Berlin Girl’s Journey to Freedom, click “Download a free excerpt” on my home page and feel free to follow my blog about anything German: historic and current events, people, places and food.

Walled-In is my story of growing up in Berlin during the Cold War. Juxtaposing the events that engulfed Berlin during the Berlin Blockade, the Berlin Airlift, the Berlin Wall and Kennedy’s Berlin visit with the struggle against my equally insurmountable parental walls, Walled-In is about freedom vs. conformity, conflict vs. harmony, domination vs. submission, loyalty vs. betrayal.

 

 

 

Is the Milgram Experiment still Relevant Today?

Monday, May 18th, 2020

 

The Milgram experiment was designed to examine conditions under which ordinary citizens willingly submit to authority. The research was part of a series of experiments on obedience conducted by social psychologist Stanley Milgram at Yale University. Specifically, Milgram wanted to find out how much pain people would inflict on others, simply because a person of authority ordered them to do so. In the experiment, an experimental scientist served as the authority figure. Forty men of various backgrounds and ages agreed to participate based on a newspaper ad that advertised a learning study. Respondents were offered a token cash award for their participation.

Structure of the Experiment

Each experiment involved three people and a mock electric shock generator. The three people were:

  1. A bogus Experimenter (an actor in a gray lab coat posing as an experimental scientist to convey authority),
  2. A Teacher (The process was rigged so that all 40 respondents ended up being teachers) and
  3. A Learner (An associate of Dr. Milgram who pretended to be a second participant in the learning study).

The stated object of the Milgram experiment was to examine the relationship between learning and memory. Teachers and bogus Learners participated in pairs of two and drew straws to determine who would be the Teacher and who would be the Learner. Unknown to participants, however, the person responding to the newspaper ad was always made the Teacher.

Procedure of the Milgram Experiment

In the Teacher’s presence, the Experimenter strapped the Learner into a chair and attached electrodes to his arms. Teacher and Experimenter then went into an adjacent room where a mock electric shock generator was located. The device displayed a row of 30 switches, indicating that shocks ranged from 15 volts (slight shock) to 450 volts (danger – severe shock). The Experimenter instructed the Teacher to administer an electric shock every time the Learner made a mistake. With each mistake, the Teacher was to increase the intensity of the shock.

Then the experiment began. The Teacher read the Learner a list of word pairs and asked him to correctly identify the word pair from a list of four choices. On purpose, the bogus Learner gave mainly wrong answers so that the Teacher had to deliver increasingly severe shocks. If the Teacher refused to administer additional shocks because the Learner appeared to be in pain, the Experimenter pressured him to continue because the experiment supposedly required him to do so.

Results of the Milgram Experiment

The studies took place only 16 years following World War II, and Milgram wondered if there might be a link between the cruel actions of ordinary German citizens during the Holocaust and their willingness to submit to authority. Results of Milgrim’s experiment showed that 65% of Teachers continued to give shocks all the way up to the highest voltage. He found that as long as the Teacher believed that the person giving the orders was qualified to do so and would accept full responsibility for the outcome, most Teachers would continue to increase shock levels even when the Learners begged them not to.

The Milgram experiment was designed to examine conditions under which ordinary citizens willingly submit to authority. www.walled-in-berlin.com

The Milgram experiment was designed to examine conditions under which ordinary citizens willingly submit to authority. www.walled-in-berlin.com

Milgram carried out 18 variations of this study by slightly altering the framework and found that obedience levels dropped slightly when Teachers observed others to disobey the orders. However, obedience levels increased when participants felt buffered from the consequences of their actions.

Implications of the Experiments

Are the Milgram experiments still relevant in today’s America? Are Americans as fiercely independent and autonomous as they think they are? Or do they submit to authority more often than they realize? These days, America is deeply divided politically. Do members of each camp decide using their own moral standard? Or do they feel pressured into supporting their party’s agenda and assume that their party leaders will take full responsibility?

 

For a sneak peek at the first 20+ pages of my memoir, Walled-In: A West Berlin Girl’s Journey to Freedom, click “Download a free excerpt” on my home page and feel free to follow my blog about anything German: historic and current events, people, places and food.

Walled-In is my story of growing up in Berlin during the Cold War. Juxtaposing the events that engulfed Berlin during the Berlin Blockade, the Berlin Airlift, the Berlin Wall and Kennedy’s Berlin visit with the struggle against my equally insurmountable parental walls, Walled-In is about freedom vs. conformity, conflict vs. harmony, domination vs. submission, loyalty vs. betrayal.

 

 

 

 

 

Schadenfreude – Source of Quiet Glee

Monday, April 20th, 2020

 

Schadenfreude is a peculiar emotion. It is the distinctly pleasurable sensation we feel when we first learn of some misfortune that befell successful friends or relatives. This burst of glee occurs involuntarily and is often mixed with shame because we don’t want to appear to lack compassion. Practically all adults feel Schadenfreude at some point. Even children, as young as one year of age, can experience the emotion.

The word is German in origin and consists of the nouns “Schaden” and “Freude.” The first means “harm,” the second means “glee”. Schadenfreude was first used in German writings in the 1740s and in English literature in 1852. There is no English substitute.

Example of Schadenfreude

The company I worked for announced the creation of a new position, a potential promotion for some of us. But management made it clear that we need not apply. They had in mind a candidate with more skills than we could bring to the table. The position was advertised and by the time the application period closed, no candidate with the desired skill set had applied. Eventually, management hired an applicant with fewer skills than any of us had to offer. Within a year, the new-hire was terminated because he had not worked out. I still remember the Schadenfreude I felt. My glee was not directed toward the ill-fated employee but toward management. By acting so smug, the powers to be had gotten what they deserved: A totally unqualified employee.

Schadenfreude is the glee we feel when someone we envy gets knocked down a peg. www.walled-in-berlin.com

Schadenfreude is the glee we feel when someone we envy gets knocked down a peg. www.walled-in-berlin.com

Connection between Schadenfreude and Self-esteem

We don’t all feel Schadenfreude at the same events or to the same degree. While some bask in their glee openly, others quickly feel ashamed and turn off their Schadenfreude valves. Research shows that people with low self-esteem are more susceptible to the emotion than individuals with a high self-regard. The former group clutches to the disappointments of others to make themselves feel better.

Two Types of Schadenfreude

Human beings evaluate themselves not so much by objective standards as by comparison to the people around them. We like to take pleasure in our moral superiority and stifle our feelings of envy and inadequacy. Psychologists associate two types of pleasures we derive from another person’s misfortune.

There is Rivalry-based or Envy-based Schadenfreude, which is driven by social comparison. When the objects of our envy have been been knocked down a peg, they return to our own level of social standing. This is often seen during sport competitions or political rivalry.

Then there is Merit-based Schadenfreude, which focuses on social justice. It is the feeling that one experiences when somebody finally gets what’s coming to them (see example above).

 

For a sneak peek at the first 20+ pages of my memoir, Walled-In: A West Berlin Girl’s Journey to Freedom, click “Download a free excerpt” on my home page and feel free to follow my blog about anything German: historic and current events, people, places and food.

Walled-In is my story of growing up in Berlin during the Cold War. Juxtaposing the events that engulfed Berlin during the Berlin Blockade, the Berlin Airlift, the Berlin Wall and Kennedy’s Berlin visit with the struggle against my equally insurmountable parental walls, Walled-In is about freedom vs. conformity, conflict vs. harmony, domination vs. submission, loyalty vs. betrayal.

 

Classical Architecture – Embraced by Trump and Hitler

Monday, March 16th, 2020

 

In 1937, Adolf Hitler announced that henceforth all new government buildings were to be constructed in the style of traditional classical architecture. The mandate was part of Hitler’s grandiose plan of transforming Berlin into “the capital of the world.” Hitler named his utopian city Germania. In this new metropolis, German government buildings were to rival the edifices of ancient Egypt, Babylon, Rome and Athens.

In early February 2020, word got out that the Trump administration was working on an Executive Order to impose classical architecture on all new U.S. Federal buildings. According to Trump, these traditional style buildings will “once again inspire respect instead of bewilderment or repugnance.” https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/11/opinion/letters/federal-architecture.html

Is this Trump’s first step toward Trumponia?

Hitler's model of Germania, a metropolis full of classical architecture the concept never materialized). Photo © J. Elke Ertle, 2017. www.walled-in-berlin.com

Hitler’s model of Germania, a metropolis full of classical architecture (the concept never materialized). Photo © J. Elke Ertle, 2017. www.walled-in-berlin.com

For a sneak peek at the first 20+ pages of my memoir, Walled-In: A West Berlin Girl’s Journey to Freedom, click “Download a free excerpt” on my home page and feel free to follow my blog about anything German: historic or current events, people, places or food.

Walled-In is my story of growing up in Berlin during the Cold War. Juxtaposing the events that engulfed Berlin during the Berlin Blockade, the Berlin Airlift, the Berlin Wall and Kennedy’s Berlin visit with the struggle against my equally insurmountable parental walls, Walled-In is about freedom vs. conformity, conflict vs. harmony, domination vs. submission, loyalty vs. betrayal.

 

Five Tricks a Demagogue Employs to Incite the Public

Thursday, February 6th, 2020

 

What is a demagogue? According to Merriam-Webster “a demagogue is a leader who makes use of popular prejudices and false claims and promises to gain power.” The art of inflaming peoples’ passions has been practiced since democracy was invented. One of the first known demagogues was the Athenian Kleon in ancient Greece. Modern-time practitioners include Adolf Hitler, Benito Mussolini, Joseph McCarthy and Donald Trump.

Adolf Hitler was a demagogue who incited the public by employing a number of tricks that are still used today. www.walled-in-berlin.com

Adolf Hitler was a demagogue who incited the public by employing a number of tricks that are still used today. www.walled-in-berlin.com

 

An orator puts to use a number of tricks to incite his/her audience. Adolf Hitler was a master in this art. By the time he came to power in 1933 he knew how to rouse the public’s emotions, prejudices and ignorances. Below are five of the many methods Hitler employed to achieve his goal. Many of the same tactics are still used by current politicians. Next time you catch some demagoguery, pay close attention to see if you recognize the ploys.

Rule 1 – A Demagogue Tells People What They Want to Hear

Following World War I, Germany was a defeated nation. Under the terms of the Treaty of Versailles the victors had deeply humiliated the country. The Weimar Republic and ist political system were broken. The economy lay in shambles. The chances for recovery in the foreseeable future were zero. Along came Adolf Hitler. He promised to “Make Germany Great Again.” That’s what people wanted to hear and believe. He played to their desires and fears.

Rule 2 – A Manipulator Communicates Directly With his Audience

In 1933, the Volksempfaenger (People’s Receiver) was invented. At the time, it was a brand-new way of communicating. The Nazis immediately recognized the radio’s propaganda potential and held the purchase price down to the equivalent of two weeks average salary. Everyone could afford one. Of course, the Nazis did not mention that the set’s sensitivity was so limited that it could receive only the Nazi propaganda channel. Hitler then used the new media platform to establish and maintain a direct and unfiltered line of communication with the public. Back then, the newly invented radio was the equivalent of today’s social media, such as Twitter and Facebook. The one-channel radio allowed Adolf Hitler to bypass the standard news media and disseminate half-truths, outright lies, innuendos and racist and religious bigotry.

Rule 3 – A Demagogue Delegitimizes the Mainstream Press

Simultaneously, Hitler began to delegitimize the mainstream press. He regularly accused his opponents of spreading false information. It was Adolf Hitler who coined the word Luegenpresse (press of lies) to vilify the mainstream press. Today we call it “fake news.”

Rule 4 – An Agitator Tries to Demonize his Opponents

Hitler demonized his political opponents by calling them vicious names, such as parasites, criminals, cockroaches and scum. He blamed Jews and other racial and religious scapegoats for all of Germany’s ills, banned non-Aryan migration into Germany and embraced mass detention and deportations.

Rule 5 – A Demagogue Uses Coercion Rather than Cooperation

Adolf Hitler rejected international cooperation in favor of military and economic coercion and did not pay any attention to expert advice. Instead, he kept his own counsel. At the end of the war, when his plans for Germania fell apart, he ordered Germany’s destruction. Then he took the cowardly way out by committing suicide while the German people paid the price for Hitler’s ill-conceived ideas for the next 45 years.

These are just five of the many tricks a demagogue employs to mislead the public to gain power. He feeds the populace a steady diet of what it wants to hear and the people fail to demand the evidence behind the allegations and promises. British politician, Geoffrey Van Orden recently called this type of behavior on the part of the public “falling into the trap of an echo chamber of self-delusion.”

 

For a sneak peek at the first 20+ pages of my memoir, Walled-In: A West Berlin Girl’s Journey to Freedom, click “Download a free excerpt” on my home page and feel free to follow my blog about anything German: historic and current events, people, places and food.

Walled-In is my story of growing up in Berlin during the Cold War. Juxtaposing the events that engulfed Berlin during the Berlin Blockade, the Berlin Airlift, the Berlin Wall and Kennedy’s Berlin visit with the struggle against my equally insurmountable parental walls, Walled-In is about freedom vs. conformity, conflict vs. harmony, domination vs. submission, loyalty vs. betrayal.

 

 

Garden dwarfs in a world of hurt

Monday, January 13th, 2020

 

Garden dwarfs (Gartenzwerge in German) are popular lawn ornaments in the western world. The figurines are almost always male wearing red, pointy caps and long, bushy white beards. Traditionally made from terracotta, they are now often manufactured from wood, porcelain, ceramics, resins or similar materials. Garden dwarfswere once believed to protect their owners from evil and to secretly help around house and garden.

Garden dwarfs (Gartenzwerge) have been popular in the western world since 1860. This little guy lives in Englewood, Florida. Photo © J. Elke Ertle, 2019.

Garden dwarfs (Gartenzwerge) have been popular in the western world since 1860. This little guy lives in Englewood, Florida. Photo © J. Elke Ertle, 2019.

History of Garden Dwarfs

The origin of these small creatures is somewhat contested. Small stone statues existed already in the gardens of ancient Rome. But the birthplace of garden dwarfs was most likely the small German town of Graefenroda.  By 1841, the Dresden company Baehr and Maresch already sold ceramic dwarfs. Within the next ten years, the popularity of these little guys spread from the German provinces of Saxony and Thuringia all across Germany and into France. In 1847, Sir Charles Isham bought 21 terracotta garden dwarfs from Philip Griebel in Graefenroda and brought them back to Britain, where they became known as “garden gnomes.” Since 1860, the town is known for its production of Gartenzwerge.

After World War I, the popularity of gnomes declined, but when Walt Disney produced the animated film Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs in the 1930s, all social classes began to purchase them. Prior to that, only the wealthy bought Gartenzwerge. In 2008, they were so popular that an estimated 25 million garden dwarfs decorated lawns in Germany. Since then, these “little people” have popped up in films, television shows, commercials, books and advertising. They even have their own holiday. Since 2002, over a dozen countries celebrate International Gnome Dayon the 21st of June 21st every year.

The Fate of the Garden Gnomes

Lately, Graefenroda’s garden dwarfs are in a world of hurt, however. Not that they have gone out of fashion. The problem is that there are not enough workers in the town anymore to produce them. The 160-year-old Philip Griebel company still exists. It is one of Germany’s last-surviving gnome makers and is currently headed by Reinhard Griebel, one of Philip Griebel’s descendants. Now Reinhard wants to retire and is looking for a successor. The problem is that Graefenroda, a town located in former East Germany, has seen an exodus of workers since the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989 and German reunification in 1990.  Before the fall of the Wall, the firm employed a work force of 60. That number has dwindled to a whopping three. Without a successor, the company, which has produced over 500 gnome characters over the years, will have to shut its doors soon.

 

For a sneak peek at the first 20+ pages of my memoir, Walled-In: A West Berlin Girl’s Journey to Freedom, click “Download a free excerpt” on my home page and feel free to follow my blog about anything German: historic and current events, people, places and food.

Walled-In is my story of growing up in Berlin during the Cold War. Juxtaposing the events that engulfed Berlin during the Berlin Blockade, the Berlin Airlift, the Berlin Wall and Kennedy’s Berlin visit with the struggle against my equally insurmountable parental walls, Walled-In is about freedom vs. conformity, conflict vs. harmony, domination vs. submission, loyalty vs. betrayal.

 

Will the Real Santa Please Stand up?

Monday, December 9th, 2019

 

For a long time, I was under the impression that Coca-Cola created today’s Santa Claus image. That’s only partly true. In reality, it took many people and many steps to create the current-day portly, jolly man in the red suit and white beard who lives at the North Pole and makes toys for children. Over time, Santa was depicted as everything from a tall gaunt man to a spooky-looking elf. He has donned a bishop’s robe and a Norse huntsman’s animal skin. His name may be a phonetic derivation of the Dutch Sinterklaas.

It took many people to create the image of Santa Claus, the portly, jolly man in the red suit and white beard who lives at the North Pole. www.walled-in-berlin.com

It took many people to create the image of Santa Claus, the portly, jolly man in the red suit and white beard who lives at the North Pole. www.walled-in-berlin.com

Washington Irving Invents the Santa Claus image

In 1812, Irving published a satirical history of New York under the pseudonym Diedrich Knickerbocker. In the book, Santa rides over the tops of trees in a horse-drawn wagon and is described as a “jolly Dutchman” who smokes a clay pipe.

Clement Clarke Moore adds the reindeer-drawn sleigh

Ten years later, Moore published the poem “A Visit from St. Nicholas,” which is now known as “The Night Before Christmas.” In it, he mentions a sleigh drawn by eight reindeer, named Dasher, Dancer, Prancer, Vixen, Comet, Cupid, Donner and Blitzen.

Thomas Nast makes Santa an elf-like figure

When Civil War political cartoonist and caricaturist Thomas Nast drew Santa Claus for Harper’s Weekly in 1862, Santa was a small elf-like figure who supported the Union. Nast continued to draw him for 30 years, eventually changing the color of his coat from tan to red and portraying a kinder-looking old fellow.

Coca-Cola uses Santa Claus image in its marketing

The Coca-Cola Company began its Christmas advertising in the 1920s with shopping-related ads in magazines like The Saturday Evening Post. The first ads used a strict-looking Santa, similar to Thomas Nast’s creations. In 1930, the artist Fred Mizen painted a department-store Santa in a crowd drinking a bottle of Coke. The painting was used in print ads that Christmas season and appeared in The Saturday Evening Post in December 1930.

Haddon Sundblom creates modern Santa Claus image

In 1931, Sundblom created a series of Santa Claus ads for Coca-Cola. Initially, the image was close to Nast’s. Over time, magazine and billboard ads helped to standardize Santa’s grandfatherly features. From 1931 to 1964, Coca-Cola ads showed him delivering toys, reading letters while enjoying a Coke and visiting with the children who waited up to greet him.

Ward’s makes Rudolph Santa’s lead Reindeer

In 1939, Montgomery Ward’s introduced Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer in its ad campaign. The song with the same name became a worldwide hit. It suggested that Santa came down from the North Pole to deliver gifts for the children. The reindeer pulled his heavy sleigh with Santa at the reigns and Rudolph in the lead.

And that’s the way it was. Merry Christmas to you all!

 

For a sneak peek at the first 20+ pages of my memoir, Walled-In: A West Berlin Girl’s Journey to Freedom, click “Download a free excerpt” on my home page and feel free to follow my blog about anything German: historic and current events, people, places and food.

Walled-In is my story of growing up in Berlin during the Cold War. Juxtaposing the events that engulfed Berlin during the Berlin Blockade, the Berlin Airlift, the Berlin Wall and Kennedy’s Berlin visit with the struggle against my equally insurmountable parental walls, Walled-In is about freedom vs. conformity, conflict vs. harmony, domination vs. submission, loyalty vs. betrayal.

 

 

 

Gatow Airport Played Key Role in Berlin Airlift

Monday, November 25th, 2019

 

Did you know that Berlin’s Gatow Airport handled more than one-third of all Berlin Airlift flights? The credit usually goes to Tempelhof Airport alone, but in fact, three airports were involved in the Berlin Airlift: Berlin-Tempelhof in the American sector, Berlin-Gatow in the British sector and Berlin-Tegel in the French Sector.

Militaer Historisches Museum - Berlin Gatow, Photo © J. Elke Ertle, 2019. www.walled-in-berlin.com

Militaer Historisches Museum – Berlin Gatow, Photo © J. Elke Ertle, 2019. www.walled-in-berlin.com

Reason for the Berlin Airlift

At the end of World War II, Germany and Berlin were divided into four occupation sectors: American, British, French and Russian. Berlin ended up deep within the Soviet zone. As part of the 1945 Potsdam Agreement, the three western Allies had negotiated free access from their West German occupation zones to their respective sectors of Berlin. In 1948, contrary to this agreement, the Soviets blocked all land and water access to West Berlin. The three Western Allies continued to support West Berlin and flew in all coal, food, and medications. The operation was known as the Berlin Airlift. Soon, an Allied plane landed every three minutes. Eleven months later, the Soviets called off the Berlin Blockade.

Gatow Airport’s Role During the Berlin Airlift

The very first planes to fly supplies into West Berlin landed at Gatow Airport, starting on 18 June 1948. Flights landed at Tempelhof Airport starting on 26 June 1948, and flights to Tegel Airport started on 5 November 1948. Both, Gatow and Tempelhof were high-tech airfields and among the first in the world to be equipped with a radar system to support ground-controlled approaches. At the time the Berlin Airlift started, two of Gatow’s runways were already in operation. A third one would be constructed shortly. Altogether, Gatow Airport handled more than 115,000 airlift flights out of a total of almost 278,000 flight to all three West Berlin airports combined.

History of Gatow Airfield

The Gatow airfield was originally constructed in 1934 and 1935 by the Luftwaffe, the German Air Force. Towards the end of World War II, advancing Red Army troops occupied the airport. Following the division of Berlin, the Soviet forces relinquished the field to the British forces in exchange for a locality at the western edge of Berlin.

Many different types of aircraft landed at Gatow Airport. Conventional transport aircraft brought coal, food and other goods. Bomber aircraft converted into tankers delivered fuels. The nearby Havel River was used as runway for flying boats. On their return flights some planes took passengers aboard. Almost 7,500 sick and undernourished children were flown from Gatow to West Germany via these flying boats.

Escapes to Gatow from East Germany

At least three successful escapes were made from East Germany to Gatow: On 7 April 1978 and 15 July 1987, a total of three East Germans defected by flying light aircrafts. Both planes were dismantled and returned to East Germany. On 24 June 1979, an East German pilot defected in a glider and landed at Gatow. The sailplane was handed back to East Germany at the Glienicke Bridge, the bridge of spies.

Today’s Use of the Airfield

Following German reunification, the British Royal Air Force stopped using Gatow Airport and handed it back to the German Armed Forces in 1994. Thereafter, the airfield was closed and the runways were cut in half. The western half became home to a housing project, and the eastern half houses the Militaer Historisches Museum, a branch of the German Armed Forces Military Museum.

 

For a sneak peek at the first 20+ pages of my memoir, Walled-In: A West Berlin Girl’s Journey to Freedom, click “Download a free excerpt” on my home page and feel free to follow my blog about anything German: historic and current events, people, places and food.

Walled-In is my story of growing up in Berlin during the Cold War. Juxtaposing the events that engulfed Berlin during the Berlin Blockade, the Berlin Airlift, the Berlin Wall and Kennedy’s Berlin visit with the struggle against my equally insurmountable parental walls, Walled-In is about freedom vs. conformity, conflict vs. harmony, domination vs. submission, loyalty vs. betrayal.